Ce mai citesc

Stanga imprejur

Dupa ce Google ne-a fortat mana sa folosim mod_rewrite pentru a genera linkuri statice, acum ne zice ca nu e bine ce facem si, el Google, stie de magariile astea, dar nu ne merge prosteala.

Cum vine asta? Dupa ce am bagat Hey-Rup cu toii, pentru a-l ajuta pe Mr. Google cu problemele lui de indexare, acum ne da in cap. Rusinica matale Dom'le. Ai aflat cumva ca alte motoare de cautare, nu sunt inca capabile in a indexa corect linkurile dinamice?

We've come across many webmasters who, like our friend, believed that static or static-looking URLs were an advantage for indexing and ranking their sites. This is based on the presumption that search engines have issues with crawling and analyzing URLs that include session IDs or source trackers. However, as a matter of fact, we at Google have made some progress in both areas. While static URLs might have a slight advantage in terms of clickthrough rates because users can easily read the urls, the decision to use database-driven websites does not imply a significant disadvantage in terms of indexing and ranking. Providing search engines with dynamic URLs should be favored over hiding parameters to make them look static.

PS: Cred ca nici nu mai stiu sa fac siteuri prezentate dinamic :D

Just for indexing | Used Cars | | Jobs | BDT India

BogdanNedelcu.com
© 2007, All rights Reserved.